The Bigger Picture - Paul Von Ward

Your Web Site's Slogan

Home

InterdisciplineCosmology

Worldview Concept

C2C Radio Interviews

Olsson. Review by PVW

David Rigoni Poem

Book/PaulContributions

NCR Radio Interview

Bosian Pyramid Project

We've Never Been Alone

AB-IH Overview

AB Intervention Evidence

How Big Is God?

Book Reviews of WNBA

Caveat Lector

Self-Learning Universe

Human Self-Governance

John Heatly on America

USGiftsWallStreet

Break WallStreet/USG Axis

Resources for Reform

Comments from Readers

Rankism and Dignity

Titles Evoke Docility

International Cooperation

Occasional Update Reports

Paul's Personal Blog

Twelve 2012 Myths

Robert McConnel 2012 View

Swicord on US Debt

Bullies-Wounds-Community

Power,Force,Bully,Victim

Government by the People

Von Ward/Brooks Exchange

This I Believe

Memorial Day 2010

Perspectives on the Site

Descriptions/Paul's Books

Overview: WNBA / G,G,&C

Order Books From Paul

Articles

U.S. Deeper Politics

Spanda Worldview Article

Worldview Article (10/05)

Human/AB Interactions

9/11 Plus 5 Birthdays

Regression Hypnotherapy

Media & Public Events

Events Archives

Von Ward on Gaiam TV

Interview Transcripts

Self-Assessment Tools

Brief Essay on Worldview

WorldviewArticle/AHPsy

Worldview Case Study

Selected Links

Interdisciplinary Cosmology Defined & Need for Independent Researchers

DO WE KNOW WHO HUMANS ARE, REALLY?

With over six billions of us on Earth, you'd think we should know. But, the fact is that we don't know where we came from, what we're doing here, or how we fit into the "big picture."

Some think humans are accidents in a chance-driven universe. Others think this universe is a natural result of activities in another universe or cosmos, but have no idea of how that one got started. Others believe we and our universe are the results of causative force, but attributions of "purposefulness" to this "causative force" reflect an almost infinite diversity of worldviews.

Different groups assert that they have "The Truth" about reality and defend it, often even with force and to their death. Long-standing personal and inter-group conflicts result from these belief systems that are only based on tenuous scientific or religious assumptions.

The violent chaos in the present global society exists because such belief systems do not evolve on the basis of real-world experience:

  • Scientists avoid dealing with anomalous aspects of human experience and nature.
  • Believers fear to examine the origins of their doctrines.
  • Educators indoctrinate instead of helping students to become self-learners.
  • Institutions defend beliefs with arrogance and force.

Paul challenges us to question orthodoxy (wherever it is found) and to test its assumptions against the evidence that seems to deny them. His long career and current work promotes:

  1. An interdisciplinary cosmology that includes various types of epistemology.
  2. Awakening to the multidimensional nature of human consciousness and subtle senses.
  3. Re-examination of our religious and scientific views about the nature of nature.
  4. Public dialogues about the assumptions that underlie our divergent belief systems.
Paul intends this site to challenge his own thinking and that of others to maintain skeptical, but open minds about basic existential questions like the following:
  1. What do I really know about the birth of life and the origin of my species?
  2. Does my life experience to-date suggest that human life serves a larger purpose?
  3. What do I assume about reality beyond my physical senses?
  4. What evidence suggests the possible existence of nonhuman life-forms?
  5. How do other species relate to my own?
  6. If the universe has multiple dimensions, how do they affect my life?
  7. What role do humans have in our apparently self-evolving universe?

DO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS INTEREST YOU?

Conventional cosmologies, whether scientific or religious, leave out much of what and who humans really are. (Click on the "Books" button to the left to learn more about Paul's Gods, Genes, & Consciousness and Our Solarian Legacy.) His books, based on as many fields of knowledge as possible, bring a profoundly new perspective to questions that most people have been culturally conditioned NOT to ask.

The comments of one 2007 reader of Gods, Genes & Consciousness captured the importance of confronting uncomfortable ideas:

"As I began reading your book my mind put up numerous barriers to what you were saying. More than once I decided to put the book down and label you a "crackpot" but for some reason I kept picking it back up and have since completed it. I realize now that it was my earlier "brainwashing" by my parents and society that at first made your book repulsive to me. I found your book enlightening and logical. Thank you for helping me to break down my mental barriers so that the light of reason could finally shine through." Warm Regards, Jon C. Gilbert.

HOW MUCH DO WE REALLY KNOW?

Paul believes any credible attempt to develop a viable worldview for the 21st century must fully integrate any epistemology available  to humans to enhance their knowledge of the universe. Consequently, he works systematically with quantum theory, subtle energies, biological evolution, string theory, genetics, creationism, religion, spirituality, history, archaeology and anthropology, consciousness studies, mind-body interactions, UFO/ET studies, frontier and esoteric science, and other areas of research to synthesize a continually evolving human story.

A brief essay prepared by Paul for a group studying materials allegedly channeled from advanced beings (ABs) can be read and downloaded at Human/AB Interactions. It gives his view on how humans and other conscious entities can interact for mutual benefit. Read Michael Murphy's poem Of ETs/ABs, Gods & Resource Wars a similar view of human physical and intellectual interactions with ABs.

Many individuals -- in their unique ways -- epitomize the questioning mind and and solid research that expands the envelope of human understanding of our place in the cosmos. One such independent scholar was Stan Hall (1936-2008), a man who dared challenge the conventional history of ancient civilizations and the place of South America in that history. His solid geological and archeological research, combined with a "puzzle-master" approach to comparative linguistics and indigenous languages, has radically changed the map and time-line of world history. Check out his discoveries in Ecuador at the website Tayos Gold maintained by his architect and conservationist daughter Eileen Hall.

WORLDVIEWS SHAPE OUR PERCEPTIONS AND BEHAVIORS

Karl Popper wrote "Science must begin with myths, and with the criticism of myths." Our worldviews (implicit, largely subconscious, assumptions about the nature of reality) go far beyond what we really know to include the world of myths and assumptions that are based in faith. In interdisciplinary cosmology we question all of our assumptions, hypothesizing more plausible explanations and testing them against all available data.

Only by constant vigilance, taking into account new evidence, can our worldviews remain consistent with the ever-expanding scope of human knowledge and make possible achievement of the human potential. That achievement depends on the level and quality of peace among groups with different worldviews. Tom Hanson writes songs that points out peace only comes from change within. His skeptical view of the official U.S. story of the 9/11 attacks, reflected in a recent song, coincides with Paul's view of such self-protective government.

AB-INTERVENTION HYPOTHESIS

Paul's book Gods, Genes & Consciousness analyzes evidence for the "intervention hypothesis," the theory that beings more advanced than humans (ABs) have been, and to some extent still are, involved in human development. He explores the "ancient astronaut" theory as a plausible explanation for the existence of artifacts that suggest civilizations more advanced than the Neolithic Era people existed prior to the Earth-wide cataclysm of 11,500 BP. His areas of research include the two new disciplines of exobiology and exopolitics, respectively the search for extra-planetary life forms and nonhuman cultures. (Access an overview of this perspective on this website page.)

A half-hour interview with Tony Pratt of Nashville's community access television's channel 19 on Paul's views and research on the intervention hypothesis provides an overview Gods, Genes & Consciousness Interview exploring material in the book.

While quite a number of writers and researchers now focus on this hypothesis, the group at OpenSETI stands out in taking a highly professional, scientific, and interdisciplinary approach. Their site maintains open forums (including one on Paul's work) on the evidence for nonhuman intelligence. One researcher, who share's top billing in this field with Paul, is Lloyd Pye of Starchild Skull fame. His work complements Paul's in the areas of DNA, fossil record, and ancient artifacts.

REINCARNATION HYPOTHESIS

Another major area of Paul's current research focuses on evidence for the historical belief in the reincarnation of individual, transcendent souls. He has developed an Integral Model to test the reincarnation hypothesis. His multi-factor evaluation tool (either professional or self-administered) assesses confidence-levels for possible identification of individual past-life connections. Click here for a brief television interview with Paul that gives an overview of this scientific approach. A self-developed case—corroborated by the Reincarnation Experiment—provides strong, multifaceted evidence for present-day artist Peter Teekamp and business entrepreneur Michelle Moshay being the reincarnations, respectively, of Paul and Mette Gauguin. See their website at Teekamp/Gauguin.

Paul's new book, The Soul Genome: Science and Reincarnation, based on primarily self-identified and objectively evaluated cases of possible linear reincarnation was published in March 2008. The book contains robust case studies that illuminate areas of the human personality and behaviors that have not been previously thought of in terms of reincarnation. It can be ordered at Amazon.com, Wheatmark Books, or other online booksellers, and through your local bookstore.

Individuals interested in learning how to be a part of his ongoing research in this area may contact Paul at the email address below. If you have a sense of a possible lifetime, whether associated with a specific identity or not, the evidence you have may help with scientific testing of the reincarnation hypothesis. Other recommended books describing the collection of empirical data related to reincarnation are Life Before Life by Jim B. Tucker, M.D. and Marilyn Monroe Returns by Adrian Finkelstein, M.D.

QUESTIONING SUPERNATURAL ASSUMPTIONS
Paul's books raise questions about the validity and historical authenticity of claims made by religious institutions about the origins of their beliefs and how they came about. Gods, Genes & Consciousness particularly focuses on the origins of the three major Western supernatural religions. Occasionally Paul reviews the books of other scholars who bring new insights to the historical record. His review of Suzanne Olsson's book Jesus in Kashmir, which assesses the Eastern evidence for the life of a historical Jesus whose life included roots in Central Asia and years of ministry there after his departure from Palestine, can be read in this PDF.

See descriptions of Paul's books and his speaking schedule at Hampton Roads Publishing or on the Reincarnation Experiment website

To purchase Paul's books Shop at Amazon.com or on this site.

Email Paul with your questions or comments through paul@vonward.com.


Need for Independent Scholars and Public Intellectuals

(Thanks for the following excerpts to Massimo Pigliucci's article Science by Think Tank The Rise of Think Tanks and the Decline of Public Intellectuals in the SKEPTIC magazine at eskeptic@skeptic.com/11-10/19.)

...what sort of people one counts as “public intellectuals,” or, for that matter, what sort of activities count as intellectual to begin with. ... some people (usually intellectuals) have actually spent a good deal of time thinking about such matters and have come up with some useful suggestions. For example, in Public Intellectuals: An Endangered Species? Amitai Etzioni quotes the Enlightenment figure Marquis de Condorcet to the effect that intellectuals are people who devote themselves to “the tracking down of prejudices in the hiding places where priests, the schools, the government and all long-established institutions had gathered and protected them.” Or perhaps one could go with the view of influential intellectual Edward Said, who said that intellectuals should “question patriotic nationalism, corporate thinking, and a sense of class, racial or gender privilege.”

Should one feel less romantic (even a bit cynical, perhaps) about the whole idea, one might prefer instead Paul Johnson, who said that “a dozen people picked at random on the street are at least as likely to offer sensible views on moral and political matters as a cross-section of the intelligentsia.” Or go with David Carter, who wrote in the Australian Humanities Review that “public intellectuals might be defined as those who see a crisis where others see an event.”

Regardless of how critical one is of the very idea of public intellectualism, everyone seems to agree that there are a few people out there who embody— for better or worse—what a public intellectual is supposed to be. By far the most often cited example is the controversial linguist and political activist Noam Chomsky.

[This website and the work of Paul Von Ward aspire to emulate the efforts of these and others.]

Home • Books • Articles • Interviews and Events • Self-Assessments Tools

Copyright © 2008 Paul Von Ward. All rights reserved.

Web Hosting powered by Network Solutions®